These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses: are large-bore catheters necessary?
    Author: Röthlin MA, Schöb O, Klotz H, Candinas D, Largiadèr F.
    Journal: Eur J Surg; 1998 Jun; 164(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 9696442.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To find out whether small-bore catheters (7 F) are as effective as the 14F sump drains generally used for drainage of abdominal abscesses. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: University hospital, Switzerland. SUBJECTS: 64 patients with intra-abdominal abscesses. INTERVENTIONS: 40 were drained with 7F pigtail catheters and 24 by 14F sump drains. RESULTS: Drainage was successful in 34/40 (85%) and 20/24 (83%), respectively. There were 3 recurrences in the small-bore and 1 in the large-bore group (p=0.4). Mean drainage time was 8 (SD 5) days and 11 (SD 11) days, respectively (p=0.29). One patient (3%) developed a complication in the small-bore group and 2 (8%) in the large-bore group. 4/6 failures in the small-bore group and 1/4 failures in the large-bore group were pancreatic abscesses. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that percutaneous drainage with small-bore catheters is as effective as drainage with bigger tubes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]