These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives.
    Author: Gordan VV, Boyer D, Söderholm KJ.
    Journal: J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 9699443.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength to enamel and dentine of two resin modified glass ionomers (Fuji Bond L.C. and Vitrebond) and two resin based adhesives (Prime&Bond 2.1 and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose). METHODS: A total of 120 bond sites were prepared on either enamel (n = 60) or dentine (n = 60) on human molars by grinding the teeth flat with a 600 grit sandpaper. Each tooth substrate group was divided into four groups (n = 15) to match each material. Each of the four material systems was applied, according to the manufacturers instructions, to the bond sites. On top of the placed material, a microfilled composite was placed in a 2.5 mm diameter matrix and light-cured for 40 s. All specimens were thermocycled 500 times (5-55 degrees C). Shear bond strength values were determined 120 h after bonding using a Zwick testing machine. One-way ANOVA was used to determine whether significant differences (p < 0.05) existed among the material groups on enamel and dentine. Pairwise comparisons were used to determine significant differences (p < 0.05) among the four products. RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed strong significant differences on enamel (p = 0.0001) and dentine (p = 0.0172). The enamel bond strength values of the two resin based adhesives were significantly higher than one of the resin modified glass ionomers (Vitrebond), while the other resin modified glass ionomers did not differ from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. On dentine, however, Vitrebond performed significantly better than the two resin based adhesives. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated resin modified glass ionomers bonded better to dentine surfaces than to enamel surfaces, while the investigated resin based adhesive systems bonded better to enamel than to dentine.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]