These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A dosimetric analysis of behavioral effects of acute toluene exposure in rats and humans. Author: Benignus VA, Boyes WK, Bushnell PJ. Journal: Toxicol Sci; 1998 Jun; 43(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 9710960. Abstract: The literature on behavioral effects of exposure to toluene is difficult to assess due, in part, to a wide variety of exposure conditions employed and outcomes measured. This study investigated whether previous experiments would be more consistent with each other if toluene exposure parameters were expressed not as concentration and duration, but as estimated amount of toluene in tissues. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to estimate concentration of toluene in arterial blood (CaTOL) from published studies in rats and humans exposed acutely to toluene vapor. Data for rats were selected from studies of avoidance behavior using both rate of responding and measures of successful responding. Data for humans were from studies of choice reaction time (CRT). Behavioral measures were converted to proportion of baseline to place them on a common scale across experiments. A meta-analysis was done to fit dose-effect curves using CaTOL and the rescaled effects. Results demonstrated that effects were an orderly function of CaTOL and were not influenced by concentration or duration of exposure, except as exposure influenced CaTOL. In rats, response rates first increased, reached a peak, and then declined as CaTOL increased. Successful avoidance in rats and CRT in humans always declined as CaTOL increased. In rats, response rates were increased by 10% at CaTOL approximately 13 ml/L. In humans, reaction times increased by 10% at CaTOL approximately 3 ml/L. Cross-species comparisons were made with the following caveats: PBPK uncertainties, few human data, and poor task comparability.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]