These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
    Author: Kluge A, Stroh H, Wagner D, Rauber K.
    Journal: Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Evaluation of technical success rate, long-term outcome and initial complication rate in patients with fluoroscopically guided port implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and April 1997 124 ports were implanted under fluoroscopic guidance in 120 patients. Indications for port implantation were anti-cancer chemotherapy, antibiotic and supportive therapy in patients with tumours or cachexia. RESULTS: Implantation was technically successful in 98.4% of the patients. We had a 3.2% minor complication rate that did not necessitate further treatment. One pneumothorax required a chest tube (0.8%). During a total of 17,534 days, complications occurred in 10.8% of all ports, 6.9% of the ports had to be explanted because of these complications. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of ports under fluoroscopic guidance has a low complication rate and good long-term results. The rate of 93.1% of functioning ports is superior to that reported in other studies. It is less costly and has a lower complication rate than surgical implantation. Therefore it seems to be the method of choice for patients requiring long-term subcutaneous venous access for chemotherapy or supportive therapy in malignant tumours or other emaciating diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]