These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Volume rendering of the tracheobronchial tree: clinical evaluation of bronchographic images.
    Author: Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Fribourg M, Duhamel A.
    Journal: Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):761-70. PubMed ID: 9722857.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the application of the volume-rendering technique to airway disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four spiral computed tomographic (CT) examination (1- to 5-mm section thickness; pitch, 1.7-20.0) were performed for known or suspected abnormality of the airways, including (a) benign tracheobronchial stenosis (group 1, n = 47), (b) complex airway lesions (group 2, n = 15), and (c) bronchiectasis (group 3, n - 12). Two radiologists independently compared overlapping transverse CT scans and volume-rendered bronchographic images for detection of airway abnormalities and identification of lesion morphology and extent, with bronchoscopic correlation. RESULTS: Bronchographic image quality was graded as excellent (73%) or good (24%), whereas motion-related artifacts led to poor image quality in 3% of cases (trapezoid parameters included window width of -700 to -350 HU, triangular trapezoid shape, parenchymal opacification of 70%, unshaded algorithm). Compared with transverse CT scans, volume-rendered images (a) provided supplemental group 3, even, seven), (b) improved confidence in the interpretation of congenital airway abnormalities in six cases (8%) (all from group 2), and (c) corrected interpretive errors in four cases (5%) (group 1, two cases; group 2, two). CONCLUSION: Volume-rendered images improved the recognition of mild changes in airway caliber and the understand of complex tracheobronchial anomalies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]