These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Usefulness of preoperative echocardiography in predicting left ventricular outflow obstruction after primary repair of interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defect.
    Author: Apfel HD, Levenbraun J, Quaegebeur JM, Allan LD.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 1998 Aug 15; 82(4):470-3. PubMed ID: 9723635.
    Abstract:
    Residual left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a significant problem after repair of interrupted aortic arch (IAA) and ventricular septal defect. Resection of subaortic tissue at the time of primary repair, however, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We reviewed the preoperative echocardiograms and the postoperative clinical course and echocardiograms of 23 consecutive patients who underwent primary repair of IAA without widening of the subaortic region. Nine patients (39%) developed significant LVOT obstruction (pressure gradient >40 mm Hg). LVOT obstruction was noted postoperatively in 7 of 9 patients by 1 month, 8 of 9 by 2 months, and 9 of 9 by 1 year. On retrospective analysis of the preoperative echocardiograms, the indexed cross-sectional area of the LVOT, the subaortic diameter index, and the subaortic diameter Z score were all significantly smaller in those requiring reintervention (p <0.04, p <0.05, p <0.05, respectively). Of these, indexed cross-sectional area had the least reproducibility and subaortic diameter index the most (coefficient of variation of 26.3% vs 11.2%). In conclusion, most patients who develop significant LVOT obstruction after repair of IAA do so within 1 month of operation. Although subaortic indexed cross-sectional area is the most sensitive predictor of LVOT obstruction after primary repair of IAA, other more simple standardized measurements of the subaortic diameter were comparably predictive and had better reproducibility.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]