These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Serum transferrin receptor concentration is not indicative of erythropoietic activity in chronic hemodialysis patients with poor response to recombinant human erythropoietin. Author: Hou CC, Wu SC, Wu SC, Yang WC, Huang TP, Ng YY. Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1998 Aug; 61(8):456-62. PubMed ID: 9745161. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Serum transferrin receptor (sTfR) is a transmembrane glycoprotein derived from erythroid precursors in the bone marrow. Its concentration provides a quantitative measure of total erythropoietic activity and an indication of functional iron deficiency. This study was conducted to investigate whether sTfR is a useful index of erythropoietic activity in chronic hemodialysis patients with poor response to maintenance recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy. METHODS: Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, sTfR concentration was measured in 67 uremic patients who had been on hemodialysis for a mean of 42 months (3-242 months). rHuEPO was administered three times a week to keep the hematocrit above 30%. Hemoglobin, red blood cell indices, serum ferritin, serum total iron binding capacity and unsaturated iron binding capacity were determined. Of the 67 patients, 35 who responded favorably to rHuEPO with hematocrits above 30% were categorized as Group I and 32 who did not attain the target hematocrit were categorized as Group II. As a control group, 31 healthy subjects were also investigated. RESULTS: The serum iron, ferritin, transferrin iron saturation, dialysis efficiency and nutritional state were not different between groups of hemodialysis patients. The mean sTfR concentration was 2.1 +/- 0.6 micrograms/ml (range, 1.15-3.53 micrograms/ml) in Group I patients, compared with 1.9 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml (range, 1.03-2.65 micrograms/ml) in Group II. The difference was not significant. In addition, the mean sTfR concentration of 1.8 +/- 0.4 micrograms/ml (range, 0.86-2.76 micrograms/ml) in the healthy controls was not significantly different from Groups I and II. CONCLUSIONS: sTfR concentration cannot be used to distinguish good from poor rHuEPO responders among chronic hemodialysis patients who have elevated serum ferritin (> 300 micrograms/l) and transferrin iron saturation (> 25%) during the course of maintenance rHuEPO therapy.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]