These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of gas exchange and hemodynamic variables during 2 types of exercise tests. Cycle-ergometry and the ergometric table].
    Author: Iovescu D, Cottin Y, Berteau O, Mouallem J, Ressencourt O, Cande F, Casillas JM, Louis P, Wolf JE.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1998 Jul; 91(7):855-61. PubMed ID: 9749177.
    Abstract:
    The development of stress echocardiography on an ergometric table has increased the number of stress tests in the decubitus position, whereas most of the information currently available concerns stress tests in the sitting position or on the treadmill. In order to study the influence of this position of stress testing, the authors compared the results obtained in a series of 15 patients without cardiac disease (Group I) and another series of 15 coronary patients (Group II) undergoing the two types of stress testing, in the vertical position on a bicycle ergometer and in the lateral decubitus position on the ergometric table. Effort tolerance on the bicycle ergometer was significantly greater in terms of work load (202 +/- 35 vs 180 +/- 36 watts (p < 0.001) in the controls, and 120 +/- 32 vs 106 +/- 22 watts (p < 0.05) in the coronary group), of duration of effort (19 +/- 3 vs 16 +/- 3 minutes (p < 0.001) in the controls and 10 +/- 3 vs 8 +/- 2 minutes (p < 0.05) in the coronary patients), of heart rate (190 +/- 10 vs 172 +/- 21 beats/min (p < 0.005) in controls and 118 +/- 19 vs 111 +/- 14 beats/min (p < 0.05) in the coronary patients). On the other hand, blood pressure and O2 saturation tended to be greater during exercise in the decubitus position: SBP 200 +/- 23 vs 196 +/- 27 mmHg (NS) in the controls and 158 +/- 21 vs 166 +/- 23 mmHg (NS) in the coronary patients; DBP 97 +/- 10 vs 102 +/- 27 mmHg (NS) in the controls and 85 +/- 6 vs 90 +/- 10 mmHg (NS) in the coronary patients; O2 sat 96.8 +/- 1 vs 97.6 +/- 0.8% (p < 0.05) in the coronary patients. The anaerobic threshold and peak VO2 were much higher during exercise in the sitting position: oxygen consumption at the threshold 14.8 +/- 3.8 vs 12.6 +/- 2.3 ml.kg-1.min-1 (p < 0.01), peak VO2 22.2 +/- 5.9 vs 18.8 +/- 4.7 ml.kg-1.min-1 (p < 0.01) in the coronary patients. The results of this study show that the cardiovascular stimulation obtained in the decubitus position is not identical to that obtained by traditional exercise stress testing, particularly in coronary patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]