These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Diagnostic value of ST depression corrected for heart rate in the post-exercise recovery period]. Author: Deluche L, Douard H, Binquet C, Chene G, Broustet JP. Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1998 Mar; 91(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 9749232. Abstract: This study assessed the diagnostic value of two new electrocardiographic criteria of coronary artery disease: the ST/HR index and the slope of the linear relationship between ST segment changes and the heart rate during the first three minutes of the post-exercise recovery period. These two criteria were compared to the standard criteria (> or = 1 mm horizontal or descending ST depression or > or = 2 mm ascending ST depression) to Detrano's ST/HR exercise index (> 1.6 microV/bpm in coronary patient), the exercise ST/HR slope (> or = 2.4 microV/bpm in coronary patients) and the exercise recovery loop (clockwise in normal and anticlockwise in coronary patients) in 88 subjects investigated for suspected coronary artery disease who underwent a computerised exercise stress test and coronary angiography (25 single vessel, 21 double vessel, 20 triple vessel disease; 22 with no significant coronary disease). The ROC identified thresholds of abnormality of the ST/HR recovery index at > or = 2.1 microV/bpm and of the ST/HR recovery slope at > or = 2.52 microV/bpm. Global comparison of the areas under the ROC showed the diagnostic superiority of the exercise ST/HR indices (0.96) over the standard criteria (0.92) and recovery indices (0.86) but without statistically significant values (p = 0.65 and p = 0.15 respectively). The ST/HR index and slope during recovery identify coronary disease with a diagnostic accuracy of 80% and 77% respectively which is similar to that (84%) of the standard ST criteria. The exercise-recovery loop was less accurate (64%).[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]