These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The cost-effectiveness of oblique radiography in the exclusion of C7-T1 injury in trauma patients.
    Author: Kaneriya PP, Schweitzer ME, Spettell C, Cohen MJ, Karasick D.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Oct; 171(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 9762975.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of bilateral oblique radiography with that of CT for excluding C7-T1 injury in trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a historical cohort model, we retrospectively studied two distinct groups of trauma patients. In the first group, which included 196 patients, CT was performed to show C7-T1 anatomy when this region was not adequately revealed on initial three-view cervical spine radiography. In the second group, which included 129 patients, routine three-view radiography was complemented by bilateral oblique views. If these five views failed to adequately reveal C7-T1 anatomy, CT was then performed to show the cervicothoracic junction. Using Medicare reimbursement data, we then compared the cost-effectiveness of CT with that of oblique radiography in terms of cost per cervical spine imaged completely to the level of C7-T1. RESULTS: In the first group, 50 (26%) of 196 patients underwent CT when C7-T1 anatomy was not adequately revealed on routine three-view cervical spine radiography. In the second group, only 17 (13%) of the 129 patients required CT when five-view radiography failed to adequately reveal C7-T1 anatomy. This difference was statistically significant (p < .01). The cost per completely imaged cervical spine was $92.00 when bilateral oblique radiographs were routinely obtained, compared with $116.28 per completely imaged cervical spine when these views were not obtained. CONCLUSION: Because bilateral oblique radiography appears to be cost-effective for the exclusion of cervical spine injuries, we suggest that it be performed routinely.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]