These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Electrocardiograph-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight versus optimized contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the peripheral arteries.
    Author: Vosshenrich R, Kopka L, Castillo E, Böttcher U, Graessner J, Grabbe E.
    Journal: Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Oct; 16(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 9814770.
    Abstract:
    We determined whether the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the peripheral run-off vessels can be improved by using contrast-enhanced (CE) three-dimensional (3D) technique in comparison to electrocardiograph (ECG)-triggered two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) technique. In a prospective study 20 patients with occlusions of the pelvic and/or femoral arteries underwent a CE 3D MRA (repetition time (TR): 5 ms, (TE) echo time: 2 ms, flip angle (FA): 30 degrees ) and an ECG-triggered 2D time-of-flight (TOF) technique (TR: 408 resp. 608 ms, TE: 7 ms, FA: 70 degrees) of the run-off vessels on a 1.5 T MR system. Each patient received a contrast material volume of 0.15 mmol/kg of body weight of gadolinium (Gd)/DTPA using an automatic injector. The tube system to the patient was flushed by 50 mL of a saline solution applied with the same injection rate as the contrast material administration. The start of the 3D MR sequence was tailored individually to the applied contrast material after determination of circulation times by a prior bolus. All patients underwent each conventional or digital arteriography for comparison, as well. The visualization of the run-off vessels was ranked on a scale of 0-3 (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = excellent) by three blinded reviewers. They also graded the vascular segments as either occluded or significantly altered (>50% reduction in diameter) or free of significant stenosis. CE 3D MRA was significantly faster in imaging the run-off vessels in comparison to the ECG-triggered 2D TOF technique. All 160 vascular segments were visualized with the 3D method, whereas only 142/160 segments were seen with 2D technique. The resulting image quality ranking of all vascular segments was significantly higher (p < 0.05) using CE 3D MRA (2.8) than with the 2D TOF technique (2.4). The detection of the stenoses was possible with both techniques. The grading of seven of seven stenoses was correct with 3D method and in five of seven cases with the 2D TOF technique. All vessel occlusions were detected by using both techniques. Small collaterals were visualized in more detail with the CE 3D MR angiography. These data demonstrate an improvement in image quality and accuracy of MRA of the peripheral arteries using a CE 3D technique in comparison to an ECG-triggered 2D TOF sequence.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]