These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel (Prepidil), with immediate oxytocin, versus vaginal insert (Cervidil) for induction of labor.
    Author: Stewart JD, Rayburn WF, Farmer KC, Liles EM, Schipul AH, Stanley JR.
    Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1175-80. PubMed ID: 9822496.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of labor induction with use of prostaglandin E2 either as an intracervical gel (Prepidil), with immediate oxytocin, or as a sustained-release vaginal insert (Cervidil) with subsequent oxytocin as needed. STUDY DESIGN: Hospitalized patients at >/=37 weeks' gestation requiring labor induction and having an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score </=6) were randomly assigned to receive either Prepidil or Cervidil. Oxytocin was begun immediately after Prepidil placement or 30 minutes after removal of the Cervidil insert if needed. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, there were no differences in demographics and eventual pregnancy outcomes between the Prepidil group (n = 77) and the Cervidil group (n = 73). Those pregnancies receiving the Prepidil-immediate oxytocin regimen were delivered sooner than those receiving the Cervidil among nulliparous (11.3 +/- 7.3 hours vs 25.2 +/- 12.5 hours, P <.001) and multiparous (8.4 +/- 7.8 hours vs 18.4 +/- 7.2 hours, P <.001) women. The mean cost savings, which favored the Prepidil-immediate oxytocin regimen, was $458 (range $204 to $630) per patient. CONCLUSION: Compared with Cervidil, the Prepidil-immediate oxytocin regimen resulted in a shorter induction-to-vaginal delivery interval and in more hospital cost savings without increasing adverse outcomes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]