These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Growth inhibitory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its synthetic analogue, 1alpha,25-dihydroxy-16-ene-23yne-26,27-hexafluoro-19-nor-cholecalcifero l (Ro 25-6760), on a human colon cancer xenograft.
    Author: Evans SR, Schwartz AM, Shchepotin EI, Uskokovic M, Shchepotin IB.
    Journal: Clin Cancer Res; 1998 Nov; 4(11):2869-76. PubMed ID: 9829754.
    Abstract:
    The effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its synthetic analogue, 1alpha,25-dihydroxy-16-ene-23yne-26,27-hexafluoro-19-n or-cholecalciferol (Ro 25-6760), have been evaluated both in vitro and in vivo in human colorectal cancer cell lines expressing high (HT-29) and low (SW-620) levels of vitamin D receptor. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 caused significant dose-dependent growth inhibition of HT-29 cells at concentrations ranging from 10(-11) to 10(-6). The antiproliferative effect of Ro 25-6760 on HT-29 cells was also dose-dependent with cell counts on day 6, ranging from 98% of control at 10(-11) M to 14% of control at 10(-6) M. However, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and Ro 25-6760 did not have any growth inhibitory effect on SW-620 at all concentrations. In mice with HT-29 tumor xenografts, administration of vitamin D at 0.1 and 0.2 microg/injection i.p. three times/week did not cause any significant tumor growth delay, whereas synthetic analogue Ro 25-6760, at both concentrations, caused a significant tumor growth inhibition in comparison with the control arm. In 30% of mice treated by R0 25-6760 the tumors disappeared on average after the second injection, and tumor growth did not resume after drug withdrawal. However, both 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or Ro 25-6760 had no growth inhibitory effect at all applied concentrations in mice with the SW-620 tumor xenografts. The mechanism for this impressive growth inhibition is not yet elucidated and warrants further investigation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]