These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) 38 and PACAP27 activate common and distinct intracellular signaling pathways to stimulate growth hormone secretion from porcine somatotropes.
    Author: Martínez-Fuentes AJ, Castaño JP, Gracia-Navarro F, Malagón MM.
    Journal: Endocrinology; 1998 Dec; 139(12):5116-24. PubMed ID: 9832451.
    Abstract:
    We have recently shown that the two bioactive forms of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, PACAP38 and PACAP27, stimulate GH release and GH messenger RNA (mRNA) accumulation in cultured porcine pituitary cells. However, dose- and time-related differences in the response to both peptides suggested that the signaling mechanisms activated by PACAP38 and PACAP27 in this cell type could differ. To test this hypothesis, we have evaluated hormone release and GH mRNA content after PACAP treatment in combination with selective activators and inhibitors of the adenylate cyclase/cAMP/protein kinase A and the phospholipase C/inositol phosphate (IP)/protein kinase C pathways, and with blockers of intra- and extracellular Ca2+. Our results show that activation of the adenylate cyclase/cAMP/protein kinase A system, and extracellular Ca2+ entry through L-type Ca2+-channels are prevailing and requisite signals for the transduction of the stimulatory effects of both PACAP38 and PACAP27 on GH release and transcription in porcine somatotropes. However, phospholipase C and intracellular Ca2+ also contribute, although partially, to PACAP38-induced, but not to PACAP27-induced increase in porcine GH secretion and mRNA levels. These findings demonstrate that in normal somatotropes, PACAP38 can activate multiple transduction pathways that differ from those employed by PACAP27. Moreover, these differences could account for the previously described divergences in the actions of either peptide in porcine somatotropes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]