These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Poor saccadic control correlates with dyslexia.
    Author: Biscaldi M, Gezeck S, Stuhr V.
    Journal: Neuropsychologia; 1998 Nov; 36(11):1189-202. PubMed ID: 9842764.
    Abstract:
    A large group of subjects, either average readers or reading/spelling disabled subjects (n = 185; age between 8-25 years; M = 13 +/- 4 years), were tested in various standardized cognitive tasks including reading/spelling assessment and in non-cognitive saccadic eye movement tasks. Dyslexics were separated into a subgroup (D1) with deficits in the serial auditory short-term memory and a subgroup (D2) with an isolated low achievement in reading/writing. Control subjects had no relevant cognitive deficit of any type. Saccadic eye movements were measured in a single target and in a sequential-target task. A significant correlation was found between abnormal saccadic control and reading disability. The two dyslexic groups showed only slight differences. As compared to the control group, the mean values of the standard deviations of the saccadic reaction times (SRT) and the amount of late saccades (SRT > 700) were significantly increased in both dyslexic groups and especially in group D1 who also showed an increased amount of anticipatory saccades. The number of express saccades (SRT = 80-134 ms) was increased, but not significantly, in D2 dyslexics. Both dyslexic groups produced significantly more regressive saccades in the sequential-target task. The correlation between saccadic variables and "reading factor" was 0.4. Significant deviations from normal performance of the saccadic variables were found in an estimated 50% of the dyslexics as compared to 20% of the control subjects. In spite of their worse level in saccadic control, dyslexics also developed with age in the eye movement performance as the control subjects did. Yet, the development was slower in group D1. It is suggested that reading process and saccade system are both controlled by visuo spatial attention and fixation systems that maybe impaired or develop slowly in many dyslexic subjects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]