These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of liver tumors. Results obtained with Riu's stain. Author: Tsou MH, Lin YM, Lin KJ, Ko JS, Wu ML. Journal: Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(6):1359-64. PubMed ID: 9850643. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with liver fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis based on Riu's stain. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed a total of 322 liver fine needle aspirates from 286 patients seen in a seven-year period from April 1990 to April 1997 at Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei. Surgical and/or clinical follow-up was available for confirmation in 292 aspirates. RESULTS: The cytologic diagnosis was categorized into four groups: benign in 81 cases, suspicious in 13, malignant in 225, and inadequate specimen in 3 cases. There were 16 false negative and no false positive diagnoses. Two suspicious aspirates were negative. Our results showed a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 100% for the detection of malignancy. If suspicious cases were considered positive, the specificity decreased to 95.1%, while the sensitivity increased to 93.6%. Among 87 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in our series, correct FNA diagnosis was made in 84 cases with an accuracy of 96.6%. Out of 135 cases of non-HCCs, 1 was incorrectly diagnosed. The accuracy of identifying a liver malignancy as non-HCC was 99.3%. CONCLUSION: Cytologic features of HCC are well demonstrated by Riu's stain, with high accuracy in identifying them. Liver FNAs using Riu's stain combined with cell block study and clinicopathologic correlation can achieve very high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of hepatic malignancies.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]