These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Pulmonary hypertension in patients with left ventricular dysfunction studied with contrast-enhanced Doppler echocardiography: relations with diastolic parameters and prognostic implications].
    Author: Dini FL, Dell'Anna R, Baldini U, Bechi S, Becuzzi L, Micheli A, Iurato A, Cordoni M, Barsotti A.
    Journal: Cardiologia; 1998 Sep; 43(9):933-45. PubMed ID: 9859608.
    Abstract:
    In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, the prognostic value of both pulmonary hypertension and mitral flow patterns has been recognized. However, the effect of the association of different degrees of pulmonary hypertension on prognosis and the corresponding left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is not clear. Accordingly, we considered the impact on survival of a categorization based on the relationship between pulmonary artery pressure and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by mitral and pulmonary venous flow analyses. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was carried out in 92 patients with ejection fraction < 45%, pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 25 mmHg and sinus rhythm. Tricuspid regurgitant velocity and Doppler parameters derived from transmitral and pulmonary venous flows were evaluated. In the case of inadequate baseline tracings, weak or poor Doppler signals were enhanced by intravenous injection of a galactose-based contrast agent (Levovist 8 ml suspension at a concentration of 400 mg/ml). To select those whose pulmonary hypertension was either proportional or unproportional to left side filling pressures, patients were divided as follows: Group 1 (n = 69) with low discrepancies and Group 2 (n = 23) with marked discrepancies between Doppler estimates of pulmonary artery systolic pressure and left side filling abnormalities. The patients of each group were also classified according to their mitral flow pattern: abnormal relaxation, pseudonormal and restrictive. Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 49 +/- 16 mmHg in the total population, 43 +/- 11 mmHg in Group 1 and 68 +/- 14 mmHg in Group 2 (p < 0.0001). Several mitral and pulmonary venous flow variables significantly correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure in the total population and in the study groups. The best correlations were observed in Group 1 as regards the ratio of reverse-to-forward atrial wave duration (r = 0.83), E wave deceleration rate (r = 0.81), E wave deceleration time (r = -0.81) and the systolic fraction of pulmonary venous flow peak velocities (r = -0.75). In Group 1, the lower heart failure-free survival rate at 10 months was observed in patients with restrictive pattern (68%) as opposed to those with pseudonormal (94%) and abnormal relaxation patterns (97%). The overall heart failure-free survival rate in Group 2 was 86%. In conclusion, the classification according to the relationship between pulmonary hypertension and the alterations of left chamber filling may contribute to the prognostic stratification of patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The patients with pulmonary hypertension proportional to the increase in left chamber filling pressures and restrictive pattern exhibited the worst prognosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]