These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.
    Author: Platt JF, Reige KA, Ellis JH.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine the effect of contrast material injection rate and patient demographic variables on vascular enhancement for abdominal CT angiography and compare test injection results with actual patterns of vascular enhancement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent abdominal CT angiography. For each patient, CT attenuation values (Hounsfield units) of the aorta were determined before and after IV contrast administration, every 3 sec between 21 and 60 sec. A peak aortic enhancement value and the time needed to reach peak and aortic enhancement thresholds of 150 and 200 H were determined. All patients received 150 ml of nonionic contrast material at 3 ml/sec in 25 patients and 4 ml/sec in 100 patients. A test injection of 15 ml was used to compute a scan delay in 46 patients. Patient age, sex, weight, injection rate, and test injection results were compared with vascular enhancement patterns. RESULTS: For the 125 patients, the mean aortic enhancement at each time point was greater than 150 H. Patient weight was inversely correlated (r2 = -.62) with aortic enhancement. The test injection did not accurately predict actual aortic enhancement peak value or time. Test injection delay time was significantly correlated with time to reach aortic enhancement thresholds of 150 and 200 H. The 4 ml/sec rate resulted in a higher peak aortic enhancement (320+/-58 H versus 281+/-49 H) (mean +/- SD, p < .01) that was reached quicker than with the 3 ml/sec injection rate (45+/-5 sec versus 52+/-5 sec) (p < .01). Injecting at 4 ml/sec resulted in greater aortic enhancement values at 24-45 sec, whereas 3 ml/sec produced significantly better aortic enhancement at 54-60 sec. CONCLUSION: The test injection correlated better with time to reach specific aortic enhancement thresholds than with time to peak aortic enhancement. For a given amount of contrast material, faster injection rates resulted in greater vascular enhancement that occurred earlier.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]