These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The "second gas effect" is not a valid concept.
    Author: Sun X-G, Su F, Shi YQ, Lee C.
    Journal: Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):188-92. PubMed ID: 9895090.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: To determine whether the "second gas effect" is valid, we determined the pharmacokinetics of 0.2% enflurane with or without 80% N2) (n = 7 each) under controlled constant volume ventilation in 14 young healthy male patients before their operations. The alveolar (end-tidal) concentration (FA) and inspired concentration (FI) at the mouthpiece and the arterial blood concentration of enflurane were measured, and the ratio of FA to FI was calculated. The FA/FI of enflurane increased rapidly during the first few minutes of administration and then increased slowly. No significant difference was found in the FA/FI between the two groups at any time point (P > 0.05). The arterial blood concentrations of enflurane increased progressively and were not significantly different between the two groups at any time point (P > 0.05). The results indicate that, at high concentrations, N2O neither facilitated the increase of FA nor enhanced the uptake of a companion gas. The second gas effect is a nonexistent phenomenon in clinical practice because the concentrating effect is very weak and the augmentation effect is nonexistent under controlled ventilation. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the effects of N2O on the ratio of alveolar (end-tidal) concentration to inspired concentration of the second gas (enflurane) and on its blood concentration in humans. Nitrous oxide did not affect the alveolar or blood concentration of the second gas under controlled constant volume ventilation. The "second gas effect" is not a valid concept.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]