These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Temperature stress for patients in routine magnetic resonance examinations].
    Author: Tomczak R, Staneczek O, Wunderlich A, Wang Y, Blasche M, Rilinger N, Rieber A, Brambs HJ.
    Journal: Rofo; 1998 Dec; 169(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 9930219.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine energy exposure and temperature changes in routine magnetic resonance imaging practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Body core and skin temperatures were compared in 155 persons (143 patients, 12 volunteers) undergoing routine magnetic resonance examinations with a 1.5 T field-strength magnetic resonance tomography unit using a fluoroptic temperature measurement system. RESULTS: Average applied energy was 0.3 W/kg for whole body and 1.92 W/kg for spatially localized SAR. The maximum whole-body SAR was 1.43 W/kg spatially localized. Body core temperatures differed from those of the control group by a median 0.1 degree C and only a few patients (16.8%) exceeded the limit (+/- 0.5%) at which regulatory mechanisms set in. All patients remained within the normal physiological circadian temperature range (+/- 1 degree C). Skin temperature rose a median 0.49 degree C, with a maximal increase of 5.31 degrees C, which may be considered to be within the limits of physiological temperature change. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant warming of the body is unlikely in routine magnetic resonance imaging practice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]