These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Author: Poirer NC, Pelletier LC, Pellerin M, Carrier M.
    Journal: Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S57-61. PubMed ID: 9930418.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the late results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis, which we have been implanting since 1981. METHODS: The 812 patients who underwent heart valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis between 1981 and 1996 were reviewed. Their clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded in a computerized database. All but 29 patients were available for follow-up (96% completeness), which averaged 58 months and totaled 3,000 patient-years. RESULTS: There were 598 aortic valve replacements (74%), 149 mitral valve replacements (18%), and 65 double valve replacements (8%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 18 to 88 years), with 24% of the patients under the age of 60 years. Preoperatively, 558 patients (69%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Associated surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 219 patients (27%) and tricuspid or mitral valve repair in 40 (5%). Previous cardiac operations had been performed in 149 patients, including 134 valve-related procedures. There were 49 early deaths overall (6%): 29 after aortic valve replacement (4.8%), 11 after mitral valve replacement (7.4%), and 9 with double valve replacement (13.8%). There were 120 late deaths for a 10-year actuarial survival rates of 69%+/-3%, 58%+/-7%, and 38%+/-10% for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement, respectively. The 14-year survival rate for aortic valve replacement patients is 68%+/-3%. The 10-year and 14-year actuarial freedom rates from events after aortic valve replacement are 92% +/-2% and 88%+/-4% for thromboembolism, 96%+/-1% and 92%+/-4 for endocarditis, 91%+/-2 and 72%+/-6% for reoperation, and 93%+/-2% and 80%+/-5% for structural dysfunction of the valve. The 10-year actuarial freedom rates from events after mitral and double valve replacement are 93%+/-3% and 89%+/-4% for thromboembolism, 95%+/-3% and 88%+/-5% for endocarditis, 76%+/-7% and 70%+/-14% for reoperation, and 81%+/-7% and 72%+/-15% for structural dysfunction. No primary tissue failure of the prosthesis in any position was observed in the 357 patients aged 70 years or more at the time of valve implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve offers excellent clinical results and durability, particularly in the aortic position and for patients older than 70 years of age.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]