These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: hemodynamic performance after 2 years.
    Author: Eichinger WB, Schütz A, Simmerl D, Gansera BU, Breuer M, Haslinger B, Kemkes BM.
    Journal: Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S126-9. PubMed ID: 9930432.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The Mosaic bioprosthesis is a porcine valve combining several new features to improve hemodynamics and durability: a low profile stent for reduced flow obstruction, zero pressure fixation to maintain the natural collagen crimp, and the amino oleic acid antimineralization treatment to enhance durability. METHODS: Fifty-five Mosaic valves were implanted in the aortic position since February 1994. Data from these patients (group 1) were compared with data from 52 patients who had received a Hancock Modified Orifice II aortic valve (group 2). The mean patient age was 72.0 (+/-5.9) years for group 1 and 76.8 (+/-4.7) years for group 2. Clinical examinations including transthoracic echocardiography were performed 6 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mild aortic insufficiencies were found in 2 patients in group 1 and in 3 patients in group 2. There were no embolic or bleeding complications. One Mosaic patient required reoperation due to mitral insufficiency. During the reoperation, a small (approximately 3 mm) thrombus was noted on the outflow side of a Mosaic cusp. The valve was removed and replaced prophylactically. In the 2-year follow-up, hemodynamic measurements showed mean pressure gradients of 12.4 mm Hg for the 21 mm, 11.3 mm Hg for the 23 mm, and 15.4 mm Hg for the 25 mm prostheses in the Hancock group. In the Mosaic group, mean pressure gradients were 14.8 mm Hg for the 21 mm, 10.9 mm Hg for the 23 mm, and 11.5 mm Hg for the 25 mm valves. Differences between pressure gradients and effective orifice areas of the Hancock and the Mosaic valves were not statistically significant. Early mortality in group 1 was 3.6% and in group 2 3.8%. Overall mortality was 12.7% and 13.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Mosaic valve has low pressure gradients for all sewing ring diameters. Compared with the Hancock Modified Orifice valve, there was no statistically significant gradient difference but a tendency toward better hemodynamics was noted in the Mosaic group after 2 years.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]