These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with the difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A durations is limited when mitral E and A waves are overlapped.
    Author: Sohn DW, Choi YJ, Oh BH, Lee MM, Lee YW.
    Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1999 Feb; 12(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 9950969.
    Abstract:
    Previous studies showed that difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A-wave durations can be used for the estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which is based on the assumption that the pulmonary venous A wave and mitral A wave start with the beginning of left atrial contraction. It is also assumed that the mitral A wave ends with the end of left atrial contraction. These assumptions may not be correct if left atrial contraction occurs before the early left ventricular filling is completed. Adequate Doppler mitral inflow and pulmonary venous flow signals were obtained simultaneously with left ventricular pressures at the cardiac catheterization laboratory in 50 patients who showed separated E and A waves in mitral inflow. After heart rate was increased by right atrial pacing to make the mitral E and A waves overlap, Doppler and hemodynamic measurements were repeated. When E and A waves are separated, pulmonary A-wave duration exceeding mitral A-wave duration has a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 85% in the prediction of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>/=20 mm Hg), whereas the pulmonary A wave ending later than mitral A wave has a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 45%. When the mitral E and A waves are overlapped, the pulmonary A wave ending later than mitral A wave is better for the prediction of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (sensitivity 55%, specificity 75%) than pulmonary A-wave duration exceeding mitral A-wave duration (sensitivity 9%, specificity 96%). However, overall, both methods are limited for clinical use.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]