These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Dual-chamber DDD pacing in NYHA III-IV functional class dilated cardiomyopathy: short and middle-term evaluation].
    Author: Occhetta E, Bortnik M, Francalacci G, Sarasso G, Piccinino C, Pistono M, Marenna B, Paffoni P, Sacchetti M, Inglese E, Trevi G.
    Journal: Cardiologia; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1327-35. PubMed ID: 9988941.
    Abstract:
    Effectiveness of dual-chamber pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy is still controversial. Our study was performed: to select the most favorable individual atrioventricular (AV) delay; to compare hemodynamic short-term effects in each patient after 2 periods of DDD pacing and sinus rhythm (AV spontaneous); to assess hemodynamic long-term (1 year) effects after DDD pacing at optimum AV delay. In 1996, 9 patients (7 men, 2 women; mean age 69 +/- 5 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy (5 idiopathic, 4 ischemic), NYHA functional class III-IV, ejection fraction < 30%, end-diastolic volume > 60 ml/m2, mitral regurgitation +2/+3, PR interval > or = 200 ms, were enrolled. All patients were implanted with DDD pacemakers and monitored for: ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume (measured by echocardiography and radionuclide angiography); clinical conditions; exercise tolerance and maximum oxygen consumption (by Weber exercise protocol); neurohormonal activity (plasma renin, aldosterone, atrial natriuretic factor). Data were recorded: before DDD implantation; after 2 randomized, single-blind periods of 3 months in VVI mode (at ventricular "sentinel" rate of 50 b/min) and in DDD mode with the optimum AV delay, corresponding for each patient to the minimum end-diastolic volume measured by radionuclide angiography and to the highest cardiac output recorded by echocardiography; after 6 months of DDD pacing with most favorable AV delay. Three more patients died 6 months after (between sixth and twelfth month of follow-up), due to refractory heart failure; 1 patient dropped out because his pacemaker was programmed in VVI mode at low rate, due to intolerance of DDD pacing. Among the other 4 patients no clinical and laboratory parameters were significantly different after 1 year of follow-up. In conclusion, DDD pacing in selected patients with dilated cardiomyopathy showed disappointing results, despite a strict and laboratory monitoring; DDD pacing could be of major benefit in larger populations, according to Doppler mitral flow pattern: those patients with a larger A-wave amplitude could be more sensitive to DDD pacing than those with evidence of poor atrial systole. Moreover, biatral and/or biventricular pacing could also play a significant role.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]