These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

659 related items for PubMed ID: 10037066

  • 1. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG, Galvin JJ.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS, Allen SL.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10466568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2570-7. PubMed ID: 9821336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Schumann A, Serman M, Gefeller O, Hoppe U.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The identification of speech in noise by cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing listeners using 6-channel signal processors.
    Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Fitzke J.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 9867296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance.
    Zeng FG, Grant G, Niparko J, Galvin J, Shannon R, Opie J, Segel P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):377-86. PubMed ID: 11831811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jan; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 12195176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.
    Shannon RV, Cruz RJ, Galvin JJ.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011 Aug; 16(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 20639631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):589-97. PubMed ID: 10641667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D, Shannon RV.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.