These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

139 related items for PubMed ID: 10048802

  • 1. Evaluation of off-line automated intima-media thickness detection of the common carotid artery based on M-line signal processing.
    Willekes C, Hoeks AP, Bots ML, Brands PJ, Willigers JM, Reneman RS.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jan; 25(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 10048802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multi-examiner reliability of automated radio frequency-based ultrasound measurements of common carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Naredo E, Möller I, Gutiérrez M, Bong DA, Cobo T, Corominas H, Corrales A, Di Geso L, Garcia-Vivar ML, Iagnocco A, Macarrón P, Navio T, Garrido J, González-Juanatey C.
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2011 Oct; 50(10):1860-4. PubMed ID: 21719420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Measurement of common carotid artery intima-media thickness in clinical practice: comparison of B-mode and RF-based technique.
    Schreuder FH, Graf M, Hameleers JM, Mess WH, Hoeks AP.
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Oct; 30(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 19544231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Does B-mode common carotid artery intima-media thickness differ from M-model?
    Van Bortel LM, Vanmolkot FH, van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Bregu M, Staessen JA, Hoeks AP.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Oct; 27(10):1333-6. PubMed ID: 11731046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of computerized edge tracking for quantifying intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from B-mode ultrasound images.
    Selzer RH, Hodis HN, Kwong-Fu H, Mack WJ, Lee PL, Liu CR, Liu CH.
    Atherosclerosis; 1994 Nov; 111(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7840805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of local differences in intima-media thickness in the human common carotid artery.
    Willekes C, Brands PJ, Willigers JM, Hoeks AP, Reneman RS.
    J Vasc Res; 1999 Nov; 36(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 10393508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Intima media thickness of the carotid arteries: early pointer to arteriosclerosis and therapeutic endpoint].
    Ludwig M, von Petzinger-Kruthoff A, von Buquoy M, Stumpe KO.
    Ultraschall Med; 2003 Jun; 24(3):162-74. PubMed ID: 12817310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Determination of intima-media thickness of the carotid artery: influences of methods, proband and examination variables].
    Frost D, Friedl A, Beischer W.
    Ultraschall Med; 1998 Aug; 19(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 9816621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How can the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness be reduced? Studies of interobserver variability in carotid and femoral arteries.
    Schmidt C, Wendelhag I.
    Clin Physiol; 1999 Jan; 19(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 10068866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Manual and automated media and intima thickness measurements of the common carotid artery.
    Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Nicolaides AN, Pantziaris M.
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 May; 56(5):983-94. PubMed ID: 19473916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reproducibility of ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness is dependent on arterial wall thickness. The Tromsø Study.
    Stensland-Bugge E, Bønaa KH, Joakimsen O.
    Stroke; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1972-80. PubMed ID: 9341706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of carotid stiffness and intima-media thickness from ultrasound data: comparison between two methods.
    Bianchini E, Bozec E, Gemignani V, Faita F, Giannarelli C, Ghiadoni L, Demi M, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1169-75. PubMed ID: 20660450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Is there an underestimation of intima-media thickness based on M-mode ultrasound technique in the abdominal aorta?
    Dahlén EM, Andreasson T, Cinthio M, Nystrom FH, Östgren CJ, Länne T.
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2012 Jan; 32(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 22152072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Tissue harmonic imaging in comparison with conventional sonography: effect on image quality and observer variability in the measurement of the intima-media thickness in the common carotid artery].
    Willinek WA, von Falkenhausen M, Strunk H, Schild HH.
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):641-5. PubMed ID: 10962992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement.
    Molinari F, Zeng G, Suri JS.
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 May; 57(5):1112-24. PubMed ID: 20442021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Wall irregularity rather than intima-media thickness is associated with nearby atherosclerosis.
    Graf IM, Schreuder FH, Hameleers JM, Mess WH, Reneman RS, Hoeks AP.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 35(6):955-61. PubMed ID: 19251354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.