These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 10050908

  • 1. A comparison of worker exposure to inhalable and total dust, inorganic arsenic, and borates using two types of particulate sampling assemblies in a borate mining and processing facility.
    Katchen MA, Puhalovich VA, Swaroop R, Culver BD.
    Biol Trace Elem Res; 1998; 66(1-3):59-64. PubMed ID: 10050908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Field comparison of inhalable and total dust samplers for assessing airborne dust in swine confinement barns.
    Predicala BZ, Maghirang RG.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 12909537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O, Grinshpun SA, Fauvel S, Basso G.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS, Carter CM, Axten C.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Exposure to silica dust in coal-mining. Analysis based on measurements made by industrial hygiene laboratories in Poland, 2001-2005].
    Mikołajczyk U, Bujak-Pietrek S, Szadkowska-Stańczyk I.
    Med Pr; 2010 May; 61(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 20677428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
    Tatum VL, Ray AE, Rovell-Rixx DC.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW, Teschke K, Demers PA.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The real-time dust exposures of sodium borate workers: examination of exposure variability.
    Woskie SR, Shen P, Eisen EA, Finkel MH, Smith TJ, Smith R, Wegman DH.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Mar; 55(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 8184800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Personal dust exposures at a food processing facility.
    Lacey SE, Conroy LM, Forst LS, Franke JE, Wadden RA, Hedeker DR.
    J Agromedicine; 2006 Mar; 11(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 16893837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Issues concerning the measurement of borate in occupational environments.
    Smith RA, Ascherl FM.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999 Mar; 60(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 10529997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M, Pacolay B, Hintz P, Andrew ME.
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.