These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
112 related items for PubMed ID: 10053055
1. Evaluation of the new AxSYM cyclosporine assay: comparison with TDx monoclonal whole blood and Emit cyclosporine assays. Wallemacq PE, Alexandre K. Clin Chem; 1999 Mar; 45(3):432-5. PubMed ID: 10053055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the fluorescent polarization (TDx) and the enzymatic competitive (EMIT 2000) immune assays for the measurement of cyclosporin A blood concentration. David-Neto E, Ballarati CA, Freitas OJ, Lemos FC, Nahas WC, Arap S, Kalil J. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo; 2000 Mar; 55(6):207-12. PubMed ID: 11313660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance and specificity of monoclonal immunoassays for cyclosporine monitoring: how specific is specific? Steimer W. Clin Chem; 1999 Mar; 45(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 10053038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cyclosporine measurement in whole blood by high-performance liquid chromatography, monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and monoclonal enzyme-multiplied immunoassay. Dusci LJ, Hackett LP, Chiswell GM, Ilett KF. Ther Drug Monit; 1992 Aug; 14(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 1519308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Parent cyclosporine in whole blood by monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay for axsym and monoclonal enzyme-multiplied immunoassay for cobas-fara. de Cos MA, Adín J, Gutiérrez-Iñiguez MA, Armijo JA. Clin Biochem; 1998 Nov; 31(8):681-5. PubMed ID: 9876902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of four automated methods for determination of whole blood cyclosporine concentrations. Hamwi A, Veitl M, Männer G, Ruzicka K, Schweiger C, Szekeres T. Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Sep; 112(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 10478141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclosporine A assays: comparison between radioimmunoassay and fluorescent polarization immunoassay technique by TDx, and the clinical significance of the polyclonal:monoclonal TDx ratio. McKenna BA, Pabico RC, Cerilli GJ. Transplant Proc; 1994 Oct; 26(5):2818-9. PubMed ID: 7940886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cyclosporine blood levels measured by radioimmunoassay and TDx assay using monoclonal antibodies. Klotz U. Ther Drug Monit; 1991 Sep; 13(5):461-3. PubMed ID: 1957340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The EMIT Cyclosporine Assay: development of application protocols for the Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 and 917 analyzers. Dias VC, Legatt DF, Yatscoff RW. Clin Biochem; 1997 Mar; 30(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 9127698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Progress report of an external quality assessment scheme for cyclosporine assay. Zucchelli GC, Pilo A, Chiesa MR, Scarlattini M, Bizollon CA. Ther Drug Monit; 1996 Jun; 18(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 8738767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclosporin whole blood immunoassays (AxSYM, CEDIA, and Emit): a critical overview of performance characteristics and comparison with HPLC. Schütz E, Svinarov D, Shipkova M, Niedmann PD, Armstrong VW, Wieland E, Oellerich M. Clin Chem; 1998 Oct; 44(10):2158-64. PubMed ID: 9761250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the AxSYM CyA assay compared with HPLC, TDx monoclonal and EMIT with both pretreatments. Steimer W. Transplant Proc; 1998 Dec; 30(8):4045-7. PubMed ID: 9865290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Specimen dilution for C2 monitoring with the Abbott TDxFLx cyclosporine monoclonal whole blood assay. Juenke JM, Brown PI, Urry FM, McMillin GA. Clin Chem; 2004 Aug; 50(8):1430-3. PubMed ID: 15277354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. FPIA and EMIT methods compared for cyclosporine monitoring in heart transplant patients. Fatio R, Sütsch G, Pei P, Follath F, Kiowski W. Clin Chem; 1998 Mar; 44(3):693-4. PubMed ID: 9510894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the AxSYM monoclonal cyclosporin assay and comparison with radioimmunoassay. Sabaté I, Ginard M, González JM, Baró E, Acebes G, Cuadros J, Lirón FJ. Ther Drug Monit; 2000 Aug; 22(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 10942190 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a monoclonal antibody fluorescent polarization immunoassay with monoclonal antibody radioimmunoassay for cyclosporin determination in whole blood. Alvarez JS, Sacristan JA, Alsar MJ. Ther Drug Monit; 1992 Feb; 14(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 1546394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the cyclosporine parent-compound-specific whole blood TDx assay. Pescovitz MD, Book BK, Pollard SG, Milgrom ML, Leapman SB, Filo RS. Clin Transplant; 1992 Feb; 6(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 10147649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Homogenous enzyme immunoassay for cyclosporine in whole blood using the EMIT 2000 cyclosporine specific assay with the COBAS MIRA-plus analyzer. Kimura S, Iyama S, Yamaguchi Y, Kanakura Y. J Clin Lab Anal; 2001 Feb; 15(6):319-23. PubMed ID: 11793432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion of cardiac and liver transplant recipients from HPLC and FPIA (polyclonal) to an FPIA (monoclonal) technique for measurement of blood cyclosporin A. McBride JH, Kim S, Rodgerson DO, Reyes A. J Clin Lab Anal; 1998 Feb; 12(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9850184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]