These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

634 related items for PubMed ID: 10072678

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields.
    Radestock S, Böhm M, Gohlke H.
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug 25; 48(17):5466-79. PubMed ID: 16107145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
    Liu S, Zhang C, Zhou H, Zhou Y.
    Proteins; 2004 Jul 01; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Novel, customizable scoring functions, parameterized using N-PLS, for structure-based drug discovery.
    Catana C, Stouten PF.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Jul 01; 47(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17238252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S, Derksen S, Radestock S, Mörchen F.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb 01; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC, Langley DR, Kang J, Huang H, Kulkarni A.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul 01; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game?
    Marsden PM, Puvanendrampillai D, Mitchell JB, Glen RC.
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov 21; 2(22):3267-73. PubMed ID: 15534704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Watson P, Gillet V, Willett P.
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar 30; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Mar 30; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.