These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 10080324

  • 1. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
    Lim CC, Neo J, Yap A.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA.
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Yap AU, Tan S, Teh TY.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 10672147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU, Yap WY, Yeo EJ, Tan JW, Ong DS.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Feb; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Droz D.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008 Feb; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
    Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Sep; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 10784332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Yap AU, Yeo EJ, Yap WY, Ong DS, Tan JW.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Mar; 28(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 12540118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
    Evancusky JW, Meiers JC.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Roulet J.
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements?
    Arweiler NB, Auschill TM, Reich E.
    J Adhes Dent; 2000 Aug; 2(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11317375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Jul; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.