These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

379 related items for PubMed ID: 10112214

  • 1. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Jun 18; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council].
    Shelton JD.
    IRB; 1999 Jun 18; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Protection of human subjects.
    United States.
    Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct 01; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
    Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul 01; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
    Branson R.
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jul 01; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Protection of human subjects--Department of Energy. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1980 Nov 25; 45(229):78600-5. PubMed ID: 10248830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan 25; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Jun 18; 56(117):28025-9. PubMed ID: 10112215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1975 Jun 18; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
    Katz J.
    IRB; 1987 Jun 18; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
    Jellinek MS, Levine RJ.
    IRB; 1982 Oct 18; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments.
    Abram MB, President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
    IRB; 1982 May 18; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul 18; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. No-fault compensation for human subjects injured in biomedical research: a public policy conflict.
    Glass JC.
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985 Jul 18; 48(3):2-7. PubMed ID: 4034661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct 18; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The development of policy guidelines governing human experimentation in the United States: a case study of public policy-making for science and technology.
    Frankel MS.
    Ethics Sci Med; 1975 May 18; 2(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 765128
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection.
    Childress JF.
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998 May 18; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.