These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 101134

  • 1. Proposed ticarcillin disk control values for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: multicenter cooperative study.
    Prior RB, Fass RJ.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Sep; 14(3):507-8. PubMed ID: 101134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Agar disk diffusion susceptibility characteristics of azlocillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin.
    Phaneuf D, Neu HC.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Nov; 16(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 118706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In vitro activity of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, sisomicin and netilmicin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Watanakunakorn C, Glotzbecker C.
    Chemotherapy; 1978 Nov; 24(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 100282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Inability of carbenicillin to predict ticarcillin activity versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa by disc-agar diffusion.
    Flournoy DJ.
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Nov; 4(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 6811811
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sensitivity to carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and the beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK in 1978-79.
    King JD, Farmer T, Reading C, Sutherland R.
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Mar; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 6769973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vitro activity of ticarcillin, carbenicillin and ampicillin against some gram-negative bacilli.
    Legakis NJ, Papavassiliou J.
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1975 Nov; 28(11):912-9. PubMed ID: 811636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the effects of ticarcillin and carbenicillin upon Psuedomonas aeruginosa.
    Kalkani E, Marketos N.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan; 9(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 816248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of mezlocillin, piperacillin, Bay k 4999 with carbenicillin and ticarcillin against enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Sobel JD, Levison ME, Kaye D.
    Infection; 1980 Jan; 8(3):121-2. PubMed ID: 6448229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative antibacterial activity of azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin and relative stability to beta-lactamases of pseudomonas aeruginosa and klebsiella aerogenes.
    Basker MJ, Edmondson RA, Sutherland R.
    Infection; 1979 Jan; 7(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 108220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative activity in vitro of ticarcillin, BL-P1654, and carbenicillin.
    Eickhoff TC, Ehret JM.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Aug; 10(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 984764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.