These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

234 related items for PubMed ID: 10125975

  • 1. Preliminary survey findings. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Cahill N.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 May; 78(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10125975
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Voyles CR.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparoscopic instruments. Patient care, cost issues.
    Reichert M.
    AORN J; 1993 Mar; 57(3):637-51, 654-5. PubMed ID: 8439132
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt C, Morawe G, Encke A.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995 Mar; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Study deems single-use instruments more cost-effective than reusable in lap choly procedures.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Jul; 20(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172368
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C, Prost P, Michiels C, Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP, Phelip JM, Martin L, Rassiat E, Faivre J.
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001 Jul; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB, Santa-Cruz R, Weeks ES, Alexander L, Hogan RB.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG, Blackmore K, Parsons L.
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI.
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Apr; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer KD, Daschner FD.
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.