These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 10140662

  • 1. Private accreditation as a substitute for direct government regulation in public health insurance programs: when is it appropriate?
    Kinney ED.
    Law Contemp Probl; 1994; 57(4):47-74. PubMed ID: 10140662
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Health care reform and the constitutional limits on private accreditation as an alternative to direct government regulation.
    Astrue MJ.
    Law Contemp Probl; 1994; 57(4):75-87. PubMed ID: 10140663
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The place of private accrediting among the instruments of government.
    Havighurst CC.
    Law Contemp Probl; 1994; 57(4):1-14. PubMed ID: 10140653
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Medicare and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: a healthy relationship?
    Jost TS.
    Law Contemp Probl; 1994; 57(4):15-45. PubMed ID: 10140656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Medicare and Medicaid programs; recognition of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations standards for home care organizations--HCFA. Final notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Jun 30; 58(124):35007-17. PubMed ID: 10127235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Special report on cooperative agreements and government recognition and reliance. Reciprocal recognition of Medicare-certified entities expanded under network program.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1998 Jun 30; 18(3):18. PubMed ID: 10187531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. JCAHO disputes findings on private sector accreditation of nursing facilities.
    Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Sep 23; 6(19):1, 4. PubMed ID: 10187582
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Joint Commission receives federal recognition for hospices.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1999 Sep 23; 19(5):4. PubMed ID: 10662021
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Providers disappointed in decision on deemed status; reaction to proposed new enforcement initiatives mixed.
    Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jul 29; 6(15):1-2. PubMed ID: 10181971
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. JCAH and the federal government.
    Schlicke CP.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1979 Mar 29; 64(3):23-8. PubMed ID: 10297370
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The etiquette of Chevron: was the court serving escargot or the main course?
    Hellow JR.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1997 Jun 29; 30(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 10169574
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.