These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


96 related items for PubMed ID: 10153384

  • 1. Cost analysis for procedure comparisons.
    Trowers EA, Batra SC, Buessler J, Anderson LK.
    Med Group Manage J; 1995; 42(6):58-65. PubMed ID: 10153384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Costing medical practice services: cost per RVU/procedure.
    Cressy CN.
    Med Group Manage J; 1995; 42(3):24, 30, 32. PubMed ID: 10155932
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Using activity-based costing to track resource use in group practices.
    Zeller TL, Siegel G, Kaciuba G, Lau AH.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Sep; 53(9):46-50. PubMed ID: 11066706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. ABC the best method for determining physician group practice costs.
    Fitzpatrick MA.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Jan; 51(1):6, 26. PubMed ID: 10163894
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Potential costs of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Evans RW.
    Gastroenterology; 1996 Dec; 111(6):1758-60. PubMed ID: 8942758
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Costs under capitation.
    Thibadoux GM, Scheidt M, Jeffords R.
    Med Group Manage J; 1997 Dec; 44(5):95-100. PubMed ID: 10174978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Colorectal cancer screening: is the gain worth the pain?
    Lowenfels AB.
    Gastroenterology; 1997 Jul; 113(1):366. PubMed ID: 9207305
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool.
    Atkin WS.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Mar; 10(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9585024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cost accounting helps ensure group practice profitability.
    Conrad KA, Nagle CB, Wunar RJ.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1996 Nov; 50(11):60-4. PubMed ID: 10162350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Re: improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Loeve F, Brown ML, Boer R, Habbema JD.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct 18; 92(20):1691-2. PubMed ID: 11036117
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Measuring productivity using RBRVS cost accounting.
    Shackelford JL.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Jan 18; 53(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 10339169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Colorectal cancer--to screen or not to screen?
    Lance P.
    HMO Pract; 1989 Jan 18; 3(4):137-41. PubMed ID: 10313512
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Thriving under capitation.
    Borg SA, Gossin LJ.
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Nov 18; 14(11):18-20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10154784
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Screening for colorectal cancer: the light at the end of the tunnel.
    Caprilli R, Taddei G.
    Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1997 Apr 18; 29(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 9646188
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The best ways to divide overhead.
    Lowes RL.
    Med Econ; 1997 Nov 24; 74(23):77-8, 81-4, 87-8. PubMed ID: 10175849
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
    Hassan C, Benamouzig R, Spada C, Ponchon T, Zullo A, Saurin JC, Costamagna G.
    Endoscopy; 2011 Sep 24; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.