These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

476 related items for PubMed ID: 10173036

  • 1. Quality control practices and preferences in today's clinical laboratory. A report for government regulators, decision makers, and advisors.
    Cooper WG.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jun; 29(6):56-7, 60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 10173036
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The physicians' view of the lab, Part 1. Clinicians examine the lab, and they like what they see.
    Jahn M.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Apr; 29(4):26-7, 30, 32-4. PubMed ID: 10172980
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. How to evaluate medical laboratories.
    O'Connor M.
    Med Sect Proc; 1989 Apr; ():103-10. PubMed ID: 2641549
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Calibration verification and CAP.
    Castellani WJ, Sarewitz SJ.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 May; 36(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 15250096
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. "Point-of-care" laboratory testing: is decentralized testing the best alternative for your hospital?
    Health Devices; 1995 May; 24(5-6):173-207. PubMed ID: 7591806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quality concerns uncovered at laboratories doing waived tests.
    Szabo J.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Oct; 33(10):32-4. PubMed ID: 11688089
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quality control and quality management of alternate-site testing.
    Handorf CR.
    Clin Lab Med; 1994 Sep; 14(3):539-57. PubMed ID: 7805345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MLO's national CLIA '88 survey, Part I: The self-assessment survey.
    Berger D, Buttitta P.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jan; 30(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 10176484
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The physicians' view of the lab, Part 2. Doctors speak their minds on lab profiles and problems.
    Jahn M.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jun; 29(6):32, 34, 36-8. PubMed ID: 10173035
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Voluntary professional programs for the evaluation and accreditation of clinical laboratories in the United States.
    Eilers RJ.
    Med Instrum; 1974 Jun; 8(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 4812343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The role of standards and training in preparing for accreditation.
    Woodcock S, Fine G, McClure K, Unger B, Rizzo-Price P.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 134(3):388-92. PubMed ID: 20716794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clarification: Standard QC.1.40, element of performance 4.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Jun; 26(6):6. PubMed ID: 16802753
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Changes to laboratory standards.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jul; 24(7):9-11. PubMed ID: 15328765
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.