These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 10174091

  • 21. A real alternative to cost-cutting. Managing the revenue cycle is an often ignored way to stay in the black.
    Stockamp D.
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Sep 22; 33(38):25. PubMed ID: 14571527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. As others see us, Part 3. The competitive marketplace: an exciting future for laboratory medicine.
    Coffman NB.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Aug 22; 30(8):52-4. PubMed ID: 10185546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Let benchmarking help you capture the competitive edge. Part two.
    Stout JL.
    JEMS; 1997 Oct 22; 22(10):58-65. PubMed ID: 10175309
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management.
    Chow CW, Ganulin D, Teknika O, Haddad K, Williamson J.
    J Healthc Manag; 1998 Oct 22; 43(3):263-80. PubMed ID: 10181801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Key performance indicators to assess laboratory operations. Benchmarking with the best.
    Heatherley SS.
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1997 Oct 22; 11(6):396-401. PubMed ID: 10176156
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The laboratory's role in outcome assessment.
    Bissell MG, Jones H.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jan 22; 30(1):54, 56-8. PubMed ID: 10176488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Cost-effective goals for analytic imprecision.
    Ricos C.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Aug 22; 113(8):823-4. PubMed ID: 2502970
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Competitive advantage through organizational structure. Recognize your dominant competitive issue.
    Nackel J.
    Healthc Exec; 1988 Aug 22; 3(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 10302698
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Error limits and quality control.
    Barnett RN.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Aug 22; 113(8):829-30. PubMed ID: 2502971
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cath lab statistics in inventory control.
    Coss TA.
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1993 Aug 22; 4(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 10126707
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Don't miss the mark.
    Kaufman HW.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Feb 22; 29(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 10165060
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Quality versus cost.
    Borges W.
    Tex Med; 2004 Jul 22; 100(7):39-40. PubMed ID: 17236310
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Leveling the playing field. The economics of robotics in the hospital clinical lab.
    Petersen JR, Bissell MG.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jan 22; 30(1):42-5, 59. PubMed ID: 10176485
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.