These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 10179719

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
    Bacarini L, Giacomich R, Saccavini C.
    Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR, Pachoud M, Bergmann D, Buhr E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Apr; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 07; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R, Kotre CJ.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 07; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May 07; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
    Hoeschen D.
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun 07; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
    Liaparinos PF, Kandarakis IS.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb 21; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D, Rong J, Chen WR, Gao F, Xu K, Wu X, Liu H.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan 21; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
    Brandt GA.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan 21; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.