These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 10183813
1. Rust corrodes: the First Amendment implications of Rust v. Sullivan. Fitzpatrick M. Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 45(1):185-227. PubMed ID: 10183813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR. J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992 Nov; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Terwilliger LM. J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Cerny RA. J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul 20; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Eroding access to reproductive services. Lado ME. Health PAC Bull; 1992 Jul 20; 22(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10183723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Webster, vagueness and the First Amendment. Bopp J, Coleson RE. Am J Law Med; 1989 Jul 20; 15(2-3):217-22. PubMed ID: 2603865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Further evidence on the internal validity of the early legal access research design. Bailey MJ, Guldi M, Hershbein BJ. J Policy Anal Manage; 2013 Jul 20; 32(4):899-904. PubMed ID: 24665473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. If only policy analysis were so easy. Joyce T. J Policy Anal Manage; 2013 Jul 20; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB. North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun 20; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ANA opposes Bush gag rule memo. deVries CM. Am Nurse; 1992 May 20; 24(5):3. PubMed ID: 1595971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy. Bailey MJ, Guldi M, Hershbein BJ. J Policy Anal Manage; 2013 May 20; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC. John Marshall Law Rev; 1990 May 20; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning. Mariner WK. Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb 20; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment. Geisel J. Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar 20; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy. Stephenson PA, Wagner MG. J Public Health Policy; 1993 Mar 20; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Graines S, Wyatt J. Clevel State Law Rev; 1999 Mar 20; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law. Funk N. Conn J Int Law; 1996 Mar 20; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion-rights groups look to 1998. Serafini MW. Natl J (Wash); 1998 Jan 03; 30(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10176714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Rust v. Sullivan". Rhodes AM. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991 Jan 03; 16(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 1749321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]