These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 10183821

  • 1. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Cerny RA.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Terwilliger LM.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993 Jun; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992 Jun; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP.
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey.
    West RL.
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB.
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Apr; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN.
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul 20; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L.
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul 20; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB, Gostin LO.
    JAMA; 2019 Jul 02; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.