These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 10190369

  • 21. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model.
    Harrell AG, Novitsky YW, Peindl RD, Cobb WS, Austin CE, Cristiano JA, Norton JH, Kercher KW, Heniford BT.
    Am Surg; 2006 Sep; 72(9):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 16986391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effective prevention of adhesions with hyaluronate.
    Kramer K, Senninger N, Herbst H, Probst W.
    Arch Surg; 2002 Mar; 137(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 11888449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Use of a mesh for musculoaponeurotic defects of the abdominal wall in cancer surgery and the risk of bowel fistulas.
    Karakousis CP, Volpe C, Tanski J, Colby ED, Winston J, Driscoll DL.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Jul; 181(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7599765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Elementary evaluation of small intestinal submucosa and polypropylene mesh used for repairing abdominal wall defect in rats].
    Zhang X, Luo J, Yang Z.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 19(7):574-7. PubMed ID: 16108349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. 120-day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement.
    Pierce RA, Perrone JM, Nimeri A, Sexton JA, Walcutt J, Frisella MM, Matthews BD.
    Surg Innov; 2009 Mar; 16(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19124448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Biological behavior of polypropylene meshes suitable for intra-abdominal implantation in animal model].
    Baracs J, Takács I, Shahram GS.
    Magy Seb; 2003 Oct; 56(5):171-6. PubMed ID: 15022620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Prevention of adhesions by bioresorbable tissue barrier following laparoscopic intraabdominal mesh insertion.
    Ozmen MM, Aslar AK, Terzi MC, Albayrak L, Berberoğlu M.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Oct; 12(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 12409701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Butler CE, Prieto VG.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 15277815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The behavior of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring process of abdominal wall defects.
    Buján J, Contreras LA, Carrera-San Martín A, Bellón JM.
    Histol Histopathol; 1997 Jul; 12(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 9225151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.