These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

466 related items for PubMed ID: 10207466

  • 21. CT angiography of the common carotid artery bifurcation: comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography.
    Castillo M, Wilson JD.
    Neuroradiology; 1994 Nov; 36(8):602-4. PubMed ID: 7862273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
    Chen Y, Xue HD, Jin ZY, Liu W, Sun H, Wang X, Zhao WM, Wang Y, Mu WB.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography--comparison of real-time volume-rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms.
    Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Wechsler RJ, Nazarian LN, Gardiner GA, Levin DC, Fishman EK.
    Radiology; 1999 May; 211(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 10228511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Link J, Brossmann J, Grabener M, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Steffens JC, Brinkmann G, Heller M.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 8770255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Dual energy CTA of the carotid bifurcation: advantage of plaque subtraction for assessment of grade of the stenosis and morphology.
    Korn A, Bender B, Thomas C, Danz S, Fenchel M, Nägele T, Heuschmid M, Ernemann U, Hauser TK.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e120-5. PubMed ID: 20833492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography.
    Cumming MJ, Morrow IM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):517-23. PubMed ID: 8079836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: assessment of interactive volume rendering.
    Verhoek G, Costello P, Khoo EW, Wu R, Kat E, Fitridge RA.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999 Sep; 23(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 10433292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques.
    Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, Jeffrey RB, McDonnell CH, Sommer FG, Wexler L, Williams DM.
    Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 8259402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results.
    Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, Mallarini G.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):716-23. PubMed ID: 17416828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA.
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.