These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

440 related items for PubMed ID: 10207570

  • 1. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO.
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED.
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J.
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Special report: new paradigms in credentialing. Peer review process called into question.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Aug; 24(8):123-6. PubMed ID: 10621289
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course?
    Brown LC, Stanton WC, Paye W.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1997 Aug; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
    Acevedo LJ.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Special report on health care delivery systems and medical staff relationships. Peer review in the era of integrated delivery systems: it's time for some massive paradigm shifts.
    Brown LC.
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Jun; 9(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 10134404
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Peer review potpourri: new developments in credentialing and privileging. Panel discussion.
    Kadzielski MA, Meinhardt RA, McCabe TA.
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Apr; (194):9-31. PubMed ID: 10144588
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA.
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Special report: new paradigms in credentialing. Avoid peer review train wreck: build compliance into your credentialing.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Jun; 24(6):85-7. PubMed ID: 10537520
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Fogel PD, Phillips EJ.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.