These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


357 related items for PubMed ID: 10224546

  • 1. Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Frezieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Coulson AH.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 10224546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the efficacy of a nonlatex condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Walsh TL, Frezieres RG, Peacock K, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Bernstein L.
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2003; 35(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 12729137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study.
    Frezieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Coulson AH.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 9561872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Avanti: similar efficacy to latex, more breaks.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Oct; 18(10):123-5. PubMed ID: 12321211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Condom slippage and breakage rates.
    Trussell J, Warner DL, Hatcher RA.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992 Oct; 24(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 1601122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials.
    Walsh TL, Frezieres RG, Peacock K, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Bernstein L, Wraxall BG.
    Contraception; 2004 Nov; 70(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 15504381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial.
    Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS.
    Contraception; 1997 Jul; 56(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9306027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Condom breakage and slippage among men in the United States.
    Grady WR, Tanfer K.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1994 Jul; 26(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 8070546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Study shows Avanti breaks more than latex condoms.
    AIDS Alert; 1997 Sep; 12(9):105-7. PubMed ID: 11364586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The male polyurethane condom: a review of current knowledge.
    Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Solomon HM, Lyszkowski AD.
    Contraception; 1996 Mar; 53(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 8689877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. FDA: polyurethane condom carries "extremely misleading" label. Federal agency allows distribution for public health's sake.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Feb; 16(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 12290714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of two commercial ultra-thin polyurethane male condoms compared to a commercial thin latex condom: a randomised, masked, 3 way crossover, multi centre controlled study (SAGCS 2).
    Potter W, Burt G, Walsh T.
    Reprod Health; 2024 Sep 04; 21(1):128. PubMed ID: 39232840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Can condom users likely to experience condom failure be identified?
    Steiner M, Piedrahita C, Glover L, Joanis C.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993 Sep 04; 25(5):220-3, 226. PubMed ID: 8262171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception.
    Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Schulz KF.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003 Sep 04; (2):CD003550. PubMed ID: 12804475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Preliminary comparison of the polyurethane female condom with the latex male condom in Kenya.
    Ruminjo JK, Steiner M, Joanis C, Mwathe EG, Thagana N.
    East Afr Med J; 1996 Feb 04; 73(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8756048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Pilot study of short-term acceptability and breakage and slippage rates for the loose-fitting polyurethane male condom eZ.on bi-directional: a randomized cross-over trial.
    Bounds W, Molloy S, Guillebaud J.
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Jun 04; 7(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 12201325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Acceptability evaluation of a natural rubber latex, a polyurethane, and a new non-latex condom.
    Frezieres RG, Walsh TL.
    Contraception; 2000 Jun 04; 61(6):369-77. PubMed ID: 10958880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Trussell J, Vaughan B.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999 Jun 04; 31(2):64-72, 93. PubMed ID: 10224544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Problems with condoms may be reduced for men taking ample time to apply them.
    Crosby RA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Sanders SA.
    Sex Health; 2010 Mar 04; 7(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 20152099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.