These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 10229885

  • 1. Shear bond strengths of two resin-modified glass ionomer cements to porcelain.
    Chung CH, Brendlinger EJ, Brendlinger DL, Bernal V, Mante FK.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):533-5. PubMed ID: 10229885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB, Cárdenas M.
    World J Orthod; 2006 Jan; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Tensile and shear bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement to glazed porcelain.
    Kitayama Y, Komori A, Nakahara R.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 12940567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY, Woods MG, Tyas MJ.
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM, Donly KJ.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Apr; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.
    Lippitz SJ, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 9637564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study.
    Chung CH, Cuozzo PT, Mante FK.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 9878957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF, Jakobsen JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10672216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Oct; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Polymerization with a micro-xenon light of a resin-modified glass ionomer: a shear bond strength study 15 minutes after bonding.
    Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Klersy C, Sfondrini G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):689-97. PubMed ID: 12512786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Oonsombat C, Laffoon J.
    World J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
    Cacciafesta V, Süssenberger U, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Miethke RR.
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 9633171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT, Cummings A, Letters S, Roger E, Love J.
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.