These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 10229885

  • 41. Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites.
    Li J, Liu Y, Liu Y, Söremark R, Sundström F.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1996 Feb; 54(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8669242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Wang L, Sakai VT, Kawai ES, Buzalaf MA, Atta MT.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. An in vitro investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents.
    Choo SC, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 23(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 11471267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC, Hart DA, Estey AW, Chan JT.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with saliva present and different enamel pretreatments.
    Godoy-Bezerra J, Vieira S, Oliveira JH, Lara F.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 16637729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Comparison of the bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to crown porcelains.
    Chay SH, Wattanapayungkul P, Yap AU, Loh PL, Chung SM.
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16433077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
    Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket-cement interface.
    Knox J, Hubsch P, Jones ML, Middleton J.
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 11099557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured glass ionomer cements bonded to resin composites.
    Farah CS, Orton VG, Collard SM.
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9612981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. The effect of long-term water storage on the tensile strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cements.
    Czochrowska E, Burzykowski T, Buyukyilmaz T, Ogaard B.
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999 Apr; 60(5):361-70. PubMed ID: 10546418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Swift EJ, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Apr; 20(4):138-43. PubMed ID: 8700781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. In vivo effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
    Pascotto RC, Navarro MF, Capelozza Filho L, Cury JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14718877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin reinforced chemical cure glass ionomer, conventional chemical cure glass ionomer and chemical cure composite resin in direct bonding systems: an in vitro study.
    Rao KS, Reddy TP, Yugandhar G, Kumar BS, Reddy SN, Babu DA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan 01; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 23579887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions.
    Pithon MM, Dos Santos RL, de Oliveira MV, Ruellas AC, Romano FL.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul 01; 76(4):700-4. PubMed ID: 16808580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.
    Valletta R, Prisco D, De Santis R, Ambrosio L, Martina R.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec 01; 29(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 17962317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. A comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of five different orthodontic bonding agents polymerized using halogen and light-emitting diode curing lights: an in vitro investigation.
    Banerjee S, Banerjee R.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Dec 01; 22(5):731-2. PubMed ID: 22406726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Effect of time on the flexural strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives.
    Azevedo C, Forestier JP, Tavernier B.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan 01; 75(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 15747826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Jan 01; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Comparison of the shear bond strengths of conventional mesh bases and sandblasted orthodontic bracket bases.
    Lugato IC, Pignatta LM, Arantes Fde M, Santos EC.
    Braz Oral Res; 2009 Jan 01; 23(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 20027448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.