These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

103 related items for PubMed ID: 10244085

  • 1. Office of Human Development Services--service programs for families and children, individuals and families, and aged, blind, or disabled persons; federal financial participation in state claims for abortions.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Oct 26; 44(209):61599-600. PubMed ID: 10244085
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Federal financial participation in state claims for abortions.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Feb 02; 43(23):4571-82. PubMed ID: 10236701
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Federal financial participation in state assistance expenditures--Office of the Secretary, HHS. Notice of federal matching shares for aid to families with dependent children. Medicaid and aid to needy aged, blind, or disabled persons for October 1, 1981--September 30, 1983.
    Fed Regist; 1980 Dec 01; 45(232):79582. PubMed ID: 10298062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.
    Fried MG.
    Conscience; 1980 Dec 01; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Questions and answers on HEW abortion regulations.
    Sellers B, Langston L.
    Gov Relat Note; 1978 Feb 10; 4(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10297094
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC.
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun 10; 101(8):1895-915. PubMed ID: 10288539
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Restricted abortion funding approved.
    Stoltz MK.
    Health Care Week; 1978 Oct 23; 2(16):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10324744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Government funding for elective abortions.
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981 Oct 23; 50():213-43. PubMed ID: 7220553
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Women and children last--the predictable effects of proposed federal funding cuts.
    Annas GJ, Mariner WK.
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Apr 28; 364(17):1590-1. PubMed ID: 21470003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Gagging the clinics.
    Smolowe J.
    Time; 1991 Jun 03; 137(22):16-7. PubMed ID: 10111508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
    Diamond E.
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976 Jun 03; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abortions bring economic pressure to bear on hospitals.
    Taravella S.
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Aug 25; 19(34):38, 40. PubMed ID: 10303809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA.
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct 25; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Obama overturns ban on federal funding of family planning organisations that promote abortion.
    Charatan F.
    BMJ; 2009 Jan 27; 338():b320. PubMed ID: 19174431
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.