These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

103 related items for PubMed ID: 10244085

  • 21. Perspectives. Family planning remains mired in politics.
    Kent C.
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Jun 08; 46(23):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10118065
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Controversy over abortion funding increases.
    Hosp Prog; 1980 Mar 08; 61(3):32. PubMed ID: 10297698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Grant recipients' rights in question.
    Willson PD.
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984 Mar 08; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Abortion compromises wearing thin.
    Brazda JF.
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Nov 08; 60(11):20. PubMed ID: 488979
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. U.S.: Obama lifts ban on funding for international groups performing or counselling abortions.
    HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2009 May 08; 14(1):33, 35. PubMed ID: 19610210
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Restriction of federal funds for abortion: 18 months later.
    Gold J, Cates W.
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Sep 08; 69(9):929-30. PubMed ID: 382879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The public funding of abortion services: comparative developments in the United States and Australia.
    Petersen KA.
    Int Comp Law Q; 1984 Jan 08; 33(1):158-80. PubMed ID: 16032815
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding.
    McDonagh EL.
    Albany Law Rev; 1999 Jan 08; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Abortion 1986: State constitutional perspectives.
    Healy JM.
    Conn Med; 1986 Jun 08; 50(6):417. PubMed ID: 3743063
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Abortion services in Canada: a patchwork quilt with many holes.
    Eggertson L.
    CMAJ; 2001 Mar 20; 164(6):847-9. PubMed ID: 11276554
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. State vs. feds. Missouri becomes battleground over funding for family-planning programs.
    Galloro V.
    Mod Healthc; 2001 Jul 30; 31(31):20-1. PubMed ID: 11508138
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from federal financial assistance: Department of Labor. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1980 Jan 04; 45(3 Pt 2):1392-409. PubMed ID: 10316919
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Federal financial participation in state assistance expenditures; federal matching shares for aid to needy aged, blind, or disabled persons for October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1991--HHS. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1989 Nov 30; 54(229):49358-9. PubMed ID: 10304084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate.
    America (NY); 1991 Jun 08; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. "Rust v. Sullivan".
    Rhodes AM.
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991 Jun 08; 16(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 1749321
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. CHA gives firm "no" to mandated insurance coverage for abortion.
    Health Prog; 1994 Jun 08; 75(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 10135166
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects--PHS. Final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1988 Feb 02; 53(21):2922-46. PubMed ID: 10285637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB.
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun 02; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug 02; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Additional federal allotments to states for social services expenditures pursuant to the Title XX-Block Grants to States for Social Services--Office of Human Development Services, HHS.
    Fed Regist; 1983 Apr 22; 48(79):17393-4. PubMed ID: 10260672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.