These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 10263571

  • 1. Medical record work standards: some practical aspects.
    Murphy CL.
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 10263571
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Establishing objective performance standards.
    Olson TR.
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 10263570
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of performance standards on productivity among medical record department employees.
    Stich EK.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Aug; 61(8):44-8. PubMed ID: 10105672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A labor productivity monitoring system in the medical record department.
    Kelm JM, Nelson AT, Schramm WR.
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):32-46. PubMed ID: 10263568
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Workload and staffing in the medical records department at Church Hospital.
    Genovese D, Vaughan RG.
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 10263572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of performance standards on job satisfaction among medical record department employees.
    Stich EK.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):60-4. PubMed ID: 10106094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance appraisal as a management tool in two hospitals.
    Baird R.
    Med Rec News; 1980 Feb; 51(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 10245214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Combining productivity management standards and scheduling.
    Wodrich J.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):21-4. PubMed ID: 10280222
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Promotion from within.
    Bottomley S.
    Hosp Superv Bull; 1981 Mar 30; (410):1-4. PubMed ID: 10250199
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Medical record department productivity standards: a case study.
    Terlep M, Poli P.
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec 30; 4(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10263573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Departmental productivity measurement/reporting in the medical record setting.
    Kahl K, Kebisek J.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Apr 30; 60(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 10292375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Management study sets medical records performance standards.
    Johnston WE.
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1979 Nov 30; 33(11):42-3, 46. PubMed ID: 10244280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Development of a medical record management control system through a work sampling study.
    Schneider D, Appleton-Schneider L.
    Med Rec News; 1980 Jun 30; 51(3):18-24. PubMed ID: 10247322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Organizational climate in two medical record departments.
    Shlachter DA.
    Med Rec News; 1977 Jun 30; 48(3):88, 90-2, 94. PubMed ID: 10305625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Word processing for the medical record department and beyond.
    Salazar R.
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep 30; 4(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 10310218
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Doctors play 'charting for dollars'. Incentives unplug medical records backlog.
    Stephens B.
    Profiles Healthc Mark; 1989 Apr 30; (34):40-1. PubMed ID: 10292688
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A method for improving record retrieval time.
    Harb CJ.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Jan 30; 54(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10309817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.