These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 10265721

  • 21. The child life assessment scale: balancing individual performance with economic and administrative imperatives.
    Hochstadt NJ, Bowditch B.
    Child Health Care; 1987; 15(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 10281595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Three questions that can improve your performance reviews.
    Umiker WO, Yohe S.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Jan; 16(1):77-80, 85. PubMed ID: 10268784
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The Criterion Referenced Performance Appraisal System can add to the effectiveness of the hospital and...improve quality of care.
    Berger L, Clipp FP.
    South Hosp; 1982 Jan; 50(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 10256842
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA.
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
    Nauright L.
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
    Sudela KD, Landureth L.
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Impact of peer performance-evaluation on job satisfaction.
    Milewski R, McKercher PL.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jul; 40(7):1202-5. PubMed ID: 6881160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. How formal appraisal systems work.
    Pucilo NP.
    Respir Ther; 1984 Jul; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. An integrated view of performance appraisal.
    McConnell CR.
    Health Care Superv; 1987 Jul; 5(4):61-78. PubMed ID: 10282627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A program for technologist rejection rate using the home computer.
    Cottrell GA.
    Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10281498
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Developing and implementing standards of practice for clinical pharmacy services.
    Miller DA, Stankiewicz RF, Zarowitz BJ, Baumann TJ, Wright DB.
    Hosp Pharm; 1987 Aug; 22(8):772-83. PubMed ID: 10283407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A three-part performance appraisal system.
    Khan MK.
    Can J Med Technol; 1982 Jun; 44(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 10256198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
    Stalker MZ, Kornblith AB, Lewis PM, Parker R.
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Development of a model performance appraisal system.
    Lemay AP, Mull V.
    Top Hosp Pharm Manage; 1988 May; 8(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 10314287
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.